Vegetarians and corpse eaters approach the same phenomenon- the consumption of dead animals- and come to opposite opinions: is it “meat” or a corpse? life or death? human slaughter or murder? delicious or repulsive? nutritious or fat-laden? departure from tradition or return to tradition? Corpse eaters see vegetarianism as a fad; vegetarians see eating animals as a larger fad. Corpse eaters see vegetarians as Puritans, legislating others’ enjoyments; vegetarians see animal eaters as resisting awareness, indulging in fantasy about where flesh comes from. Corpse eaters generally accept the cultural construction of the farm as benign, friendly, and family-based. Vegetarians see an alternate view: industry-owned, cruel, and factorylike. Corpse eaters ask, “Why did you stop eating animals?” Vegetarians respond with Plutarch, saying “You ought rather, in my opinion, to have enquired who first began this practice, than who of late times left it off.” While vegetarians regard the word vegetable with respect (it’s life-giving, the purported root of the name vegetarian), flesh-advocating cultures see it as an appropriate term for brain-dead individuals.

An excerpt from Neither Man nor Beast: Feminism and the Defense of Animals by Carol J. Adams.

“I could tell you now that I’m a vegetarian, but let’s just leave it at that. I won’t go into the reasons. If you don’t understand them, there’s not much I can say; and if you do, there’s no need to say anything.”

  1. takenforgrantedtalents posted this
to be able to discern what is true, and what is right, and what is lasting is the ultimate, wise up.

view archive



realizing i can't be that kind of artist,

me, em

ask me, or whatever,